- Provide a brief analysis of the methodology/approach employed for ranking the alternatives, how would you change or modify it (if at all) and why, to ensure a more reasonable/reliable comparison?
- In the current ranking, how (and why) would you change (if at all) the scores in the economic environment criteria
- How would you think the result of this comparison would change or shift if you asked others’ opinion? How do you think a more reliable level of validity could be achieved? Who should be involved in the this process?